lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: dra7xx: Print link state to console for debug
From
Date


On Tuesday 17 October 2017 12:05 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 11:13 +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>> Enable support for printing the LTSSM link state for debugging PCI
>> when link is down.
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>> index 34427a6..7b150b0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>> @@ -98,6 +98,18 @@ struct dra7xx_pcie_of_data {
>>
>> #define to_dra7xx_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
>>
>> +static char state[][20] = {
>> + "DETECT_QUIET", "DETECT_ACT", "POLL_ACTIVE", "POLL_COMPLIANCE",
>> + "POLL_CONFIG", "PRE_DETECT_QUIET", "DETECT_WAIT", "CFG_LINKWD_START",
>> + "CFG_LINKWD_ACEPT", "CFG_LANENUM_WAIT", "CFG_LANENUM_ACEPT",
>> + "CFG_COMPLETE", "CFG_IDLE", "RCVRY_LOCK", "RCVRY_SPEED",
>> + "RCVRY_RCVRCFG", "RCVRY_IDLE", "L0", "L0S", "L123_SEND_EIDLE",
>> + "L1_IDLE", "L2_IDLE", "L2_WAKE", "DISABLED_ENTRY", "DISABLED_IDLE",
>> + "DISABLED", "LPBK_ENTRY", "LPBK_ACTIVE", "LPBK_EXIT",
>> + "LPBK_EXIT_TIMEOUT", "HOT_RESET_ENTRY", "HOT_RESET", "RCVRY_EQ0",
>> + "RCVRY_EQ1", "RCVRY_EQ2", "RCVRY_EQ3"
>
> what's wrong with using the far more typical
>
> static const char *link_state[] = {
> "DETECT_QUIET",
> ...
> };

Too many lines?

>
>> +};
>> +
>> static inline u32 dra7xx_pcie_readl(struct dra7xx_pcie *pcie, u32 offset)
>> {
>> return readl(pcie->base + offset);
>> @@ -118,6 +130,15 @@ static int dra7xx_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>> {
>> struct dra7xx_pcie *dra7xx = to_dra7xx_pcie(pci);
>> u32 reg = dra7xx_pcie_readl(dra7xx, PCIECTRL_DRA7XX_CONF_PHY_CS);
>> + u32 cmd_reg;
>> + u32 ltssm_state;
>> +
>> + if (!(reg & LINK_UP)) {
>> + cmd_reg = dra7xx_pcie_readl(dra7xx,
>> + PCIECTRL_DRA7XX_CONF_DEVICE_CMD);
>> + ltssm_state = (cmd_reg & GENMASK(7, 2)) >> 2;
>> + dev_err(pci->dev, "Link state:%s\n", state[ltssm_state]);
>
> and why is this a dev_err and not dev_info?
> and if it's really for debugging, why not dev_dbg?
>
>> + }
>>
>> return !!(reg & LINK_UP);
>> }

Will change to dev_dbg.

Thanks,
Faiz

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-22 17:09    [W:0.584 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site