lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/58] networking: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> + linux-wireless
>
> Hi Kees,
>
> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:
>
>> This is the current set of outstanding networking patches to perform
>> conversions to the new timer interface (rebased to -next). This is not
>> all expected conversions, but it contains everything needed in networking
>> to eliminate init_timer(), and all the non-standard setup_*_timer() uses.
>
> So this also includes patches which I had queued for
> wireless-drivers-next:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9986253/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9986245/
>
> And looking at patchwork[1] I have even more timer_setup() related
> patches from you. It would be really helpful if you could clearly
> document to which tree you want the patches to be applied. I don't care

Hi! Sorry about that. It's been a bit tricky to juggle everything.

> if it's net-next or wireless-drivers-next as long as it's not the both
> (meaning that both Dave and me apply the same patch, which would be
> bad). The thing is that I really do not have time to figure out for
> every patch via which tree it's supposed to go.

Which split is preferred? I had been trying to separate wireless from
the rest of net (but missed some cases).

> For now I'll just drop all your timer_setup() related patches from my
> queue and I'll assume Dave will take those. Ok?
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

I guess I'll wait to see what Dave says.

Thanks!

-Kees

--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-17 21:48    [W:0.266 / U:30.056 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site