lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] can: check for null sk before deferencing it via the call to sock_net
From
Date
On 10/16/2017 06:37 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/08/2017 05:02 PM, Colin King wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>>
>>> The assignment of net via call sock_net will dereference sk. This
>>> is performed before a sanity null check on sk, so there could be
>>> a potential null dereference on the sock_net call if sk is null.
>>> Fix this by assigning net after the sk null check. Also replace
>>> the sk == NULL with the more usual !sk idiom.
>>>
>>> Detected by CoverityScan CID#1431862 ("Dereference before null check")
>>>
>>> Fixes: 384317ef4187 ("can: network namespace support for CAN_BCM
>>> protocol")
>>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>
>>
>> Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
>
> I don't see this one queued up in the net or net-next trees. Did it
> fall through the cracks or did it get queued up elsewhere? Seems like
> it's a good candidate to get into 4.14?

It definitely is!

Marc is our responsible guy for CAN related upstreams - but he seems to
be busy as I already poked him here:

https://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=150771819505097&w=2

If he doesn't send a pull request by beginning of next week, I would ask
Dave to grab these patches - to get them into 4.14.

Best regards,
Oliver


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-16 19:36    [W:0.045 / U:0.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site