Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:50:03 -0500 | From | "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] EDAC, sb_edac: mark expected switch fall-through |
| |
Quoting Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:00:53AM +0000, Zhuo, Qiuxu wrote: >> Hi Silva, >> >> The actual intention of the code is NOT to fall through, though >> current code can work correctly. >> Thanks for this finding. If you don't mind, I'll submit a fix >> patch for it with the tag 'Reported-by:' by you. > > I'd prefer if Gustavo would submit a patch fixing that, as he caught it > and I'd prefer if you don't top-post on public mailing lists please. >
I can do that. I will send a patch shortly.
Thanks -- Gustavo A. R. Silva
| |