lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: tracing, dma-buf: Remove unused trace event dma_fence_annotate_wait_on
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:15:45 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 05:27:59PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > Am 13.10.2017 um 16:06 schrieb Steven Rostedt:
> > > From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > >
> > > Commit e941759c74 ("fence: dma-buf cross-device synchronization") added
> > > trace event fence_annotate_wait_on, but never used it. It was renamed
> > > to dma_fence_annotate_wait_on by commit f54d186700 ("dma-buf: Rename
> > > struct fence to dma_fence") but still not used. As defined trace events
> > > have data structures and functions created for them, it is a waste of
> > > memory if they are not used. Remove the unused trace event.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>
> Since you have commit rights to drm-misc I assume you'll push this too.
>

Will it cause conflict if I pull it through my tree? It's just removing
unused traecpoints. I added it to my tree already (but haven't pushed
it to linux-next yet), with the Reviewed by from Christian. Is that OK?
It shouldn't cause any merge conflicts that Linus can't handle.

-- Steve

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-16 16:38    [W:0.045 / U:0.732 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site