Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:37:39 -0400 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: tracing, dma-buf: Remove unused trace event dma_fence_annotate_wait_on |
| |
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:15:45 +0200 Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 05:27:59PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > Am 13.10.2017 um 16:06 schrieb Steven Rostedt: > > > From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > > > > > Commit e941759c74 ("fence: dma-buf cross-device synchronization") added > > > trace event fence_annotate_wait_on, but never used it. It was renamed > > > to dma_fence_annotate_wait_on by commit f54d186700 ("dma-buf: Rename > > > struct fence to dma_fence") but still not used. As defined trace events > > > have data structures and functions created for them, it is a waste of > > > memory if they are not used. Remove the unused trace event. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > > > Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> > > Since you have commit rights to drm-misc I assume you'll push this too. >
Will it cause conflict if I pull it through my tree? It's just removing unused traecpoints. I added it to my tree already (but haven't pushed it to linux-next yet), with the Reviewed by from Christian. Is that OK? It shouldn't cause any merge conflicts that Linus can't handle.
-- Steve
| |