lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] spi-nor: intel-spi: Fix Kconfig dependency to LPC_ICH
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Cyrille Pitchen
>> warning: (SPI_INTEL_SPI_PLATFORM && ITCO_WDT) selects LPC_ICH which
>> has unmet direct dependencies (HAS_IOMEM && PCI)
>> drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c: In function 'lpc_ich_init_spi':
>> drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c:1137:3: error: implicit declaration of function
>> 'pci_bus_write_config_byte'; did you mean 'pci_write_config_byte'?
>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>
>
> Thanks for your testing. However, I believe this build error cannot be
> seen in a real system due to x86 always has PCI on. But I see you were
> doing build testing with COMPILE_TEST.

I don't think there is a general dependency on PCI for x86, other
than the fact that most device drivers require it and you'd normally
want to enable it.

>> Also, the 'depends on EXPERT' statement looks misplaced,
>> enabling EXPERT should only be there to allow you to turn
>> extra things *off*, not to hide device drivers.
>>
>
> I will leave this to Mika to comment the "EXPERT" usage. If we remove
> this, I think that should be another patch and the documentation of
> this driver should be updated too.

Ok.

>> How about this:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/Kconfig
>> index 19bcb63a1ce7..b81d9b4dae7b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/Kconfig
>> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ config SPI_INTEL_SPI
>> tristate
>>
>> config SPI_INTEL_SPI_PCI
>> - tristate "Intel PCH/PCU SPI flash PCI driver" if EXPERT
>> + tristate "Intel PCH/PCU SPI flash PCI driver"
>> depends on X86 && PCI
>> select SPI_INTEL_SPI
>> help
>> @@ -106,10 +106,10 @@ config SPI_INTEL_SPI_PCI
>> will be called intel-spi-pci.
>>
>> config SPI_INTEL_SPI_PLATFORM
>> - tristate "Intel PCH/PCU SPI flash platform driver" if EXPERT
>> - depends on X86
>> + tristate "Intel PCH/PCU SPI flash platform driver"
>> + depends on X86 && (PCI || COMPILE_TEST)
>> select SPI_INTEL_SPI
>> - select LPC_ICH
>> + select LPC_ICH if PCI
>
> I think we just need do:
>
> depends on X86 && PCI
>
> then
>
> select LPC_ICH

Right, that would solve this particular build issue, just not
allow the compile-test alternative.

We could also try to fix this more broadly, to allow compile-testing
independent of X86: It is bad style to have a 'select' statement for
a user-visible symbol (both in my version above, and yours).

The only connection I see between LPC_ICH and
SPI_INTEL_SPI_PCI is that at the moment that MFD driver is the
only thing that provides a platform device named "intel-spi", but I
see no reason why the spi-nor driver needs to know about this.

In similar cases on ARM, I tend to recommend something like

config SPI_INTEL_SPI_PLATFORM
tristate "Intel PCH/PCU SPI flash platform driver" if LPC_ICH
|| COMPILE_TEST
select SPI_INTEL_SPI

and then change all the other 'select LPC_ICH' to 'depends on
as well. If we leave the 'select' in place here, it might be good to
remove the prompt from the LPC_ICH option and have it only
selected by the other drivers.

Arnd

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-16 14:35    [W:1.768 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site