Messages in this thread | | | From | Kees Cook <> | Date | Mon, 16 Oct 2017 17:30:56 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] PM: Convert timers to use timer_setup() |
| |
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > On Tuesday, October 17, 2017 2:19:48 AM CEST Kees Cook wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki >> <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> wrote: >> > On 10/17/2017 1:20 AM, Kees Cook wrote: >> >> >> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer >> >> to >> >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and >> >> from_timer() >> >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. Removes test of .data field, since >> >> that will be going away. >> >> >> >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> >> >> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> >> >> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> >> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> >> >> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org >> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> >> > >> > >> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> >> >> Do you want this to be carried in the timers tree, or can you pick it up? > > I can pick it up, but only for 4.15.
Yup, this is based on -next. Thanks!
-Kees
-- Kees Cook Pixel Security
| |