lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PM: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 17, 2017 2:19:48 AM CEST Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki
>> <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> wrote:
>> > On 10/17/2017 1:20 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer
>> >> to
>> >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and
>> >> from_timer()
>> >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. Removes test of .data field, since
>> >> that will be going away.
>> >>
>> >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>> >> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
>> >> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
>> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>> >> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
>> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>> >
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>>
>> Do you want this to be carried in the timers tree, or can you pick it up?
>
> I can pick it up, but only for 4.15.

Yup, this is based on -next. Thanks!

-Kees

--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-17 02:31    [W:0.046 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site