Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add bug_on when f2fs_gc even fails to get one victim | From | Chao Yu <> | Date | Fri, 13 Oct 2017 19:09:51 +0800 |
| |
On 2017/10/11 21:51, Yunlong Song wrote: > This can help us to debug on some corner case. > > Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com> > --- > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c > index 197ebf4..960503e 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c > @@ -986,6 +986,7 @@ int f2fs_gc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool sync, > .ilist = LIST_HEAD_INIT(gc_list.ilist), > .iroot = RADIX_TREE_INIT(GFP_NOFS), > }; > + bool need_gc = false;
How about changing variable name to need_fggc for better readability?
Thanks,
> > trace_f2fs_gc_begin(sbi->sb, sync, background, > get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES), > @@ -1018,8 +1019,10 @@ int f2fs_gc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool sync, > if (ret) > goto stop; > } > - if (has_not_enough_free_secs(sbi, 0, 0)) > + if (has_not_enough_free_secs(sbi, 0, 0)) { > gc_type = FG_GC; > + need_gc = true; > + } > } > > /* f2fs_balance_fs doesn't need to do BG_GC in critical path. */ > @@ -1028,6 +1031,7 @@ int f2fs_gc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool sync, > goto stop; > } > if (!__get_victim(sbi, &segno, gc_type)) { > + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !total_freed && need_gc); > ret = -ENODATA; > goto stop; > } >
| |