Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCHv2 0/7] Add support for USB OTG on STM32F7 | From | Alexandre Torgue <> | Date | Wed, 11 Oct 2017 14:05:22 +0200 |
| |
Hi
On 10/11/2017 01:50 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com> writes: >> Hi Felip >> >> On 10/11/2017 12:04 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com> writes: >>>> The STM32F7 MCU family embeds two DWC2 USB OTG cores. One core is USB >>>> OTG FS and the other is USB OTG HS. The USB FS core only works with its >>>> internal phy whilst the USB HS core can work in HS with external ULPI phy >>>> or in FS/LS with the on-chip FS phy. >>>> >>>> Amelie Delaunay (7): >>>> dt-bindings: usb: Document the STM32F7 DWC2 USB OTG HS core binding >>>> usb: dwc2: add support for STM32F7 USB OTG HS >>>> ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU >>> >>> I have applied these three patches. Should I take the rest? They seems >>> like they could go upstream through the ARM maintainers. >>> >> >> I will take other DT patches in my PR. >> >> Concerning "ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU" patch >> I prefer also to take it. This patch adds some pinctrl groups but stm32 >> pinctrl bindings will change in my next PR (we will use a macro to >> define pins instead of using defined values). So if you push the DT >> patch through your pull request there will be a merge issue. >> It is possible that I take also this one ? > > In that case, it's best if you take them all :-) Here's my Ack: > > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com> > > I'll drop them from my tree now
Ok perfect, I will take DT patches (3 to 7) and I let you take patch 1&2 in your tree.
Thanks Alex
>
| |