lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCHv2 0/7] Add support for USB OTG on STM32F7
From
Date
Hi

On 10/11/2017 01:50 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com> writes:
>> Hi Felip
>>
>> On 10/11/2017 12:04 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com> writes:
>>>> The STM32F7 MCU family embeds two DWC2 USB OTG cores. One core is USB
>>>> OTG FS and the other is USB OTG HS. The USB FS core only works with its
>>>> internal phy whilst the USB HS core can work in HS with external ULPI phy
>>>> or in FS/LS with the on-chip FS phy.
>>>>
>>>> Amelie Delaunay (7):
>>>> dt-bindings: usb: Document the STM32F7 DWC2 USB OTG HS core binding
>>>> usb: dwc2: add support for STM32F7 USB OTG HS
>>>> ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU
>>>
>>> I have applied these three patches. Should I take the rest? They seems
>>> like they could go upstream through the ARM maintainers.
>>>
>>
>> I will take other DT patches in my PR.
>>
>> Concerning "ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU" patch
>> I prefer also to take it. This patch adds some pinctrl groups but stm32
>> pinctrl bindings will change in my next PR (we will use a macro to
>> define pins instead of using defined values). So if you push the DT
>> patch through your pull request there will be a merge issue.
>> It is possible that I take also this one ?
>
> In that case, it's best if you take them all :-) Here's my Ack:
>
> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
>
> I'll drop them from my tree now

Ok perfect, I will take DT patches (3 to 7) and I let you take patch 1&2
in your tree.


Thanks
Alex

>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-11 14:08    [W:0.069 / U:1.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site