lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ACPI/IORT: Fix iort_node_get_id() mapping entries indexing
From
Date
On 2017/1/9 14:34, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Sinan,
>
> On 2017/1/8 5:09, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> On 1/5/2017 1:29 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> Commit 618f535a6062 ("ACPI/IORT: Add single mapping function")
>>> introduced a function (iort_node_get_id()) to retrieve ids for IORT
>>> named components.
>>>
>>> iort_node_get_id() takes an index as input to refer to a specific
>>> mapping entry in the mapping array to retrieve the id at a specific
>>> index provided the index is below the total mapping count; currently the
>>> index is used to retrieve the mapping value from the correct entry but
>>> not to dereference the correct entry while retrieving the mapping
>>> output_reference (ie IORT parent pointer), which consequently always
>>> resolves to the output_reference of the first entry in the mapping
>>> array.
>>>
>>> Update the map array entry pointer computation in iort_node_get_id() to
>>> take into account the index value, fixing the issue.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 618f535a6062 ("ACPI/IORT: Add single mapping function")
>>> Reported-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>>> Cc: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
>>> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
>>> Cc: Nate Watterson <nwatters@codeaurora.org>
>>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 6 +++---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>>> index e0d2e6e..ba156c5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>>> @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ struct acpi_iort_node *iort_node_get_id(struct
>>> acpi_iort_node *node,
>>> return NULL;
>>>
>>> map = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_iort_id_mapping, node,
>>> - node->mapping_offset);
>>> + node->mapping_offset + index * sizeof(*map));
>>
>> What does this give us that the previous code didn't do?
>
> Fir example, if you have multi mappings ids under platform device:
>
> |-------------|
> | SMMU 2 |<-------
> |-------------| |
> |
> |
> |-------------| |
> | SMMU 1 |<---- |
> |-------------| | |
> | |
> | |
> |-------------| | |
> | platform | | |
> | device | | |
> |-------------| | |
> | stream id | | |
> | 1 | | |
> | parent------|----| |
> |-------------| |
> | stream id | |
> | 2 | |
> | parent-----|-------|
> |-------------|
>
> For now, we just use the first entry in the mapping entry to get
> the parent, and always point to the same parent, as above, we will
> always map to SMMU 1 even if you connect to different SMMUs. (Although
> we may don't have such device topology yet)
>
>
>>
>> You are using map as a pointer and returning the offset of the first
>> map entry above
>> and then accessing the map at the indexed offset with map[index]
>>
>> The new code is using map as a plain pointer, calculating the pointer
>> location with ACPI_ADD_PTR
>> instead and then collecting the output parameter with map->output_base.
>>
>>>
>>> /* Firmware bug! */
>>> if (!map->output_reference) {
>>> @@ -348,10 +348,10 @@ struct acpi_iort_node *iort_node_get_id(struct
>>> acpi_iort_node *node,
>>> if (!(IORT_TYPE_MASK(parent->type) & type_mask))
>>> return NULL;
>>>
>>> - if (map[index].flags & ACPI_IORT_ID_SINGLE_MAPPING) {
>>> + if (map->flags & ACPI_IORT_ID_SINGLE_MAPPING) {
>>> if (node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_NAMED_COMPONENT ||
>>> node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_PCI_ROOT_COMPLEX) {
>>> - *id_out = map[index].output_base;
>>> + *id_out = map->output_base;
>>
>> You are claiming that the existing code is collecting the output
>> parameter from the first mapping.
>> I don't see this happening above.
>>
>> What am I missing?
>
> It's not about the output id but it's about the parent returned
> by this function, it always return the first entry's parent in the
> mapping entry.

And as Lorenzo said in the commit message:
"always resolves to the output_reference of the first entry in the
mapping array."

Then always judge the same entry for:

if (!map->output_reference)
pr_err();

...

Thanks
Hanjun

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-09 07:49    [W:0.055 / U:1.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site