[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 09:27:23AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 05:30:02PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > ata_force_param_buf is __initdata and shouldn't really matter.
> >
> > It mainly matters because of e.g. bootloader limitations.
> Do we need a full 4k for the force parameters? What would a typical
> command line for it look like?

Maybe a couple hundreds bytes at max, but it's a bit weird to restrict
this given that it is bss, not gigantic and __initdata. What kind of
bootloader limitations are we talking about?



 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-09 18:32    [W:0.096 / U:0.712 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site