[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 04:40:19PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> There are two more that annoy me, but I don't know how to fix them:
> ata_scsi_rbuf - 4096 +4096
> ata_force_param_buf - 4096 +4096

ata_force_param_buf is __initdata and shouldn't really matter.
ata_scsi_rbuf, hmmm, idk. Maybe we can allocate it dynamically when
registering the first ATA device so that systems w/o them can avoid
the wastage.



 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-09 17:06    [W:0.094 / U:1.876 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site