lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.9 025/116] staging: lustre: ldlm: pl_recalc time handling is wrong
Date
4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

commit b8cb86fd95bb461c3496e1f4b4083b198c963a9c upstream.

James Simmons reports:
> The ldlm_pool field pl_recalc_time is set to the current
> monotonic clock value but the interval period is calculated
> with the wall clock. This means the interval period will
> always be far larger than the pl_recalc_period, which is
> just a small interval time period. The correct thing to
> do is to use monotomic clock current value instead of the
> wall clocks value when calculating recalc_interval_sec.

This broke when I converted the 32-bit get_seconds() into
ktime_get_{real_,}seconds() inconsistently. Either
one of those two would have worked, but mixing them
does not.

Staying with the original intention of the patch, this
changes the ktime_get_seconds() calls into ktime_get_real_seconds(),
using real time instead of mononic time.

Fixes: 8f83409cf238 ("staging/lustre: use 64-bit time for pl_recalc")
Reported-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_pool.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_pool.c
@@ -356,10 +356,10 @@ static int ldlm_pool_recalc(struct ldlm_
u32 recalc_interval_sec;
int count;

- recalc_interval_sec = ktime_get_seconds() - pl->pl_recalc_time;
+ recalc_interval_sec = ktime_get_real_seconds() - pl->pl_recalc_time;
if (recalc_interval_sec > 0) {
spin_lock(&pl->pl_lock);
- recalc_interval_sec = ktime_get_seconds() - pl->pl_recalc_time;
+ recalc_interval_sec = ktime_get_real_seconds() - pl->pl_recalc_time;

if (recalc_interval_sec > 0) {
/*
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int ldlm_pool_recalc(struct ldlm_
count);
}

- recalc_interval_sec = pl->pl_recalc_time - ktime_get_seconds() +
+ recalc_interval_sec = pl->pl_recalc_time - ktime_get_real_seconds() +
pl->pl_recalc_period;
if (recalc_interval_sec <= 0) {
/* DEBUG: should be re-removed after LU-4536 is fixed */
@@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ int ldlm_pool_init(struct ldlm_pool *pl,

spin_lock_init(&pl->pl_lock);
atomic_set(&pl->pl_granted, 0);
- pl->pl_recalc_time = ktime_get_seconds();
+ pl->pl_recalc_time = ktime_get_real_seconds();
atomic_set(&pl->pl_lock_volume_factor, 1);

atomic_set(&pl->pl_grant_rate, 0);

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-06 23:51    [W:1.082 / U:0.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site