Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:57:02 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] PM / Domains: Introduce domain-performance-states binding |
| |
On 06-01-17, 14:16, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > On 12/12/2016 04:26 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > Some platforms have the capability to configure the performance state of > > their Power Domains. The performance levels are represented by positive > > integer values, a lower value represents lower performance state. > > > > The power-domains until now were only concentrating on the idle state > > management of the device and this needs to change in order to reuse the > > infrastructure of power domains for active state management. > > > > This patch adds binding to describe the performance states of a power > > domain. > > The bindings would also need to take into account the fact that a device > could (and is quite often the case with qcom platforms) have 2 separate > powerdomains, one for idle state management and another to manage active > states. I guess the below bindings assume that there's just one.
I have answered a similar question here..
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=148067565219477&w=2
-- viresh
| |