lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH V7 1/4] Documentation/devicetree/bindings: b850v3_lvds_dp
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Peter Senna Tschudin
<peter.senna@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
> On 03 January, 2017 23:51 CET, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 09:24:29PM +0100, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
>> > Devicetree bindings documentation for the GE B850v3 LVDS/DP++
>> > display bridge.
>> >
>> > Cc: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.co.uk>
>> > Cc: Martin Donnelly <martin.donnelly@ge.com>
>> > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
>> > Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
>> > Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
>> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>> > Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@collabora.com>
>> > ---
>> > There was an Acked-by from Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> for V6, but I changed
>> > the bindings to use i2c_new_secondary_device() so I removed it from the commit
>> > message.
>> >
>> > .../devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3-lvds-dp.txt | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> Generally, bindings are not organized by vendor. Put in
>> bindings/display/bridge/... instead.
>
> Will change that.
>
>>
>> > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3-lvds-dp.txt
>> >
>> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3-lvds-dp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3-lvds-dp.txt
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index 0000000..1bc6ebf
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3-lvds-dp.txt
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
>> > +Driver for GE B850v3 LVDS/DP++ display bridge
>> > +
>> > +Required properties:
>> > + - compatible : should be "ge,b850v3-lvds-dp".
>>
>> Isn't '-lvds-dp' redundant? The part# should be enough.
>
> b850v3 is the name of the product, this is why the proposed name. What about, b850v3-dp2 dp2 indicating the second DP output?

Humm, b850v3 is the board name? This node should be the name of the bridge chip.

Rob

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-04 21:41    [W:0.102 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site