Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log | From | Nayna <> | Date | Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:08:42 +0530 |
| |
> From: "Ken Goldman" <kgold@linux.vnet.ibm.com > <mailto:kgold@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> > Date: 26-Jan-2017 2:53 AM > Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs > support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log > To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > <mailto:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>>, > <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org > <mailto:linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>>, > <tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> > Cc: > > You do not need to send a new patch set version as long as this > one gets peer tested. And it needs to be tested without hacks > like plumbing TCPA with TPM 2.0 in QEMU. OF code paths needs to > be peer tested to be more specific. > > For me the code itself looks good but I simply cannot take it in > in the current situation. > > /Jarkko > > > Tested-by: Kenneth Goldman <kgold@linux.vnet.ibm.com > <mailto:kgold@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> > > I validated a firmware event log taken from a Power 8 against PCR 0-7 > values for the SHA-1 and SHA-256 banks from a Nuvoton TPM 2.0 chip on > that same platform. >
Thank You Ken.
Jarkko, I hope now these patches can be accepted for 4.11.
Thanks & Regards, - Nayna
> -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-security-module" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > <mailto:majordomo@vger.kernel.org> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > <http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html>
| |