Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Date | Thu, 26 Jan 2017 06:22:20 -0800 |
| |
On 01/25/2017 09:38 PM, Stafford Horne wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:54:53PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 01/25/2017 08:37 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >>> [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 23/01/2017 (Mon 23:11) Stafford Horne wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> >>>> Are all of these builds using the tests from lkp-tests [0]? >>> >>> Not using any specific tests, other than compiling allmodconfig and >>> defconfig. >>> >>>> >>>> If so and no one is working on openrisc toolchain updates I will package up >>>> a modern toolchain for the cdn [1] and send patches for lkp-test. >>>> >>>> If there is something else that needs to be done let me know. >>>> >>>> [0] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git >>>> [1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.5.1/ >>> >>> If you could work with Tony (his email is at the bottom of the crosstool >>> front page in [1]) to get the or32 binutils updated, that would be >>> great. With all the arch currrently in linux, I pretty much have to >>> just use what is available from kernel.org as prebuilts. >>> >> >> Different problem, but from the 0day info I thought you might be interested >> in the following breakage as well (seen in -next). >> >> /opt/buildbot/slave/next-next/build/arch/score/kernel/traps.c: In function 'do_adedata': >> /opt/buildbot/slave/next-next/build/arch/score/kernel/traps.c:185:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'search_exception_tables' >> >> Reported on kerneltests.org. > > Thanks Guenter, > > Is this for me of Paul? > Paul, sorry.
Guenter
| |