lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 31/37] misc: Add host side pci driver for pci test function device
From
Date
Hi,

On Tuesday 24 January 2017 09:32 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:56:20PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Add PCI endpoint test driver that can verify base address
>> register, legacy interrupt/MSI interrupt and read/write/copy
>> buffers between host and device. The corresponding pci-epf-test
>> function driver should be used on the EP side.
>
> Just curious: what would you think of a text based (e.g. debugfs)
> interface to avoid the need for a userspace tool here?

I felt having a userspace tool gives the flexibility to add more tests
(iterations, sizes etc..) while the driver can just focus on performing simple
tests. Say we'd like to perform infinite read/write tests, it's better if the
userspace tool invokes read/write tests repeatedly instead of that being
implemented in the driver.
>
>> +static const struct pci_device_id pci_endpoint_test_tbl[] = {
>> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_ANY_ID) },
>> + { }
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, pci_endpoint_test_tbl);
>
> Also this looks really odd, and dangerous. Probing for any
> TI device will bind to all kinds of legit devices. It would
> be good if you could squeeze out a single id for this device

There is actually an id for the device, but I think we'll need an id for every
function right?

Having said that the id for the device is better than PCI_ANY_ID. Will fix it
in my next revision.

Thanks
Kishon

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-25 06:43    [W:0.192 / U:0.448 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site