Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Jan 2017 12:34:48 -0500 (EST) | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4] net: ethernet: faraday: To support device tree usage. | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:46:14 +0800
> We also use the same binding document to describe the same faraday ethernet > controller and add faraday to vendor-prefixes.txt. > > Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com> > --- > Changes in v4: > - Use the same binding document to describe the same faraday ethernet controller and add faraday to vendor-prefixes.txt. > Changes in v3: > - Nothing changed in this patch but I have committed andestech to vendor-prefixes.txt. > Changes in v2: > - Change atmac100_of_ids to ftmac100_of_ids > > --- > .../net/{moxa,moxart-mac.txt => faraday,ftmac.txt} | 7 +++++-- > .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 + > drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c | 7 +++++++ > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/{moxa,moxart-mac.txt => faraday,ftmac.txt} (68%) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/moxa,moxart-mac.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/faraday,ftmac.txt > similarity index 68% > rename from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/moxa,moxart-mac.txt > rename to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/faraday,ftmac.txt
Why are you renaming the MOXA binding file instead of adding a completely new one for faraday? The MOXA one should stick around, I don't see a justification for removing it.
| |