Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: KVM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations | From | Paolo Bonzini <> | Date | Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:06:33 +0100 |
| |
On 23/01/2017 10:48, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >> The others are useless churn or they make the result uselessly different >> from the rest of KVM code. > > I got an other view about potential benefits around the suggested movements > for error code settings.
I'll consider them when your emails stop looking like the output a Markov chain.
Paolo
> Would others like to help in approaches for checking corresponding run time changes > a bit more?
| |