Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends | From | Paolo Bonzini <> | Date | Mon, 23 Jan 2017 14:58:29 +0100 |
| |
On 23/01/2017 14:42, Markus Heiser wrote: > > Am 04.01.2017 um 23:06 schrieb Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>: > >> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 16:22:22 +0100 >> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> these patches are the result of my experiments with using kernel-doc >>> for QEMU's documentation. Patches 1 and 2 should be relatively >>> straightforward, as they are simple bugfixes. Patches 3 to 5, instead, >>> are making the docbook backend (and the others too) more consistent with >>> the input and output of the rST backend. >>> >>> I am not sure what is the state of the kernel-doc non-rST backends; >>> but there are still several books using the docbook workflow, so I'm >>> trying my luck and sending the patches anyway. :) >> >> I've played with them a bit, and they don't seem to break things, so I'll >> go ahead and apply them. > > Hi Paolo ! > > Sorry for my late reply, I'am testing patch 2: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-doc@vger.kernel.org/msg08503.html > > but I can't find any changes in the reST output (even not in include/linux/log2.h > you mentioned). May I'm a bit blind today, so can you give me an example where > the patch takes effect?
I found this with QEMU. You need to test with an inline function which has attributes with arguments.
Paolo
| |