lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration
From
Date

> Yeah, that could be problematic. The code snippet gives the general idea but it
> could be changed by for example by a flag telling the cpus when they enter idle
> to update their state_count. Or something like that.

Yes, this idea could be helpful.

But since the idle path isn't a hot path. and a few memory access won't
cost a lot. So I doubt if the benefit could be measurable.


>
> But if you think the patchset is fine, it is ok, we can improve things afterwards.
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-22 02:32    [W:0.086 / U:0.488 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site