Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration | From | Alex Shi <> | Date | Sun, 22 Jan 2017 09:31:44 +0800 |
| |
> Yeah, that could be problematic. The code snippet gives the general idea but it > could be changed by for example by a flag telling the cpus when they enter idle > to update their state_count. Or something like that.
Yes, this idea could be helpful.
But since the idle path isn't a hot path. and a few memory access won't cost a lot. So I doubt if the benefit could be measurable.
> > But if you think the patchset is fine, it is ok, we can improve things afterwards. >
| |