lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Potential issues (security and otherwise) with the current cgroup-bpf API
On Wed 18-01-17 14:18:50, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Michal.
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:58:30PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > This would require using hierarchical cgroup iterators to iterate over
>
> It does behave hierarchically.
>
> > tasks. As per Andy's testing this doesn't seem to be the case. I haven't
>
> That's not what Andy's testing showed. What that showed was that
> program in a child can override the one from its ancestor.

My fault, I've misread Andy's test case. I thought that the child group
simply disabled the bpf program and the one from the parent hasn't
executed.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-19 10:01    [W:0.179 / U:0.368 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site