lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] follow up nodereclaim for 32b fix
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:36:59AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hi,
> I have previously posted this as an RFC [1] but there didn't seem to be
> any objections other than some requests to reorganize the changes in
> a slightly different way so I am reposting the series and asking for
> inclusion.
>
> This is a follow up on top of [2]. The patch 1 cleans up the code a bit.
> I haven't seen any real issues or bug reports but conceptualy ignoring
> the maximum eligible zone in get_scan_count is wrong by definition. This
> is what patch 2 does. Patch 3 removes inactive_reclaimable_pages
> which was a kind of hack around for the problem which should have been
> addressed at get_scan_count.
>
> There is one more place which needs a special handling which is not
> a part of this series. too_many_isolated can get confused as well. I
> already have some preliminary work but it still needs some testing so I
> will post it separatelly.
>
> Michal Hocko (3):
> mm, vmscan: cleanup lru size claculations
> mm, vmscan: consider eligible zones in get_scan_count
> Revert "mm: bail out in shrink_inactive_list()"
>

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>

--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-17 12:14    [W:0.074 / U:0.680 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site