lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/8] blk-mq-sched: add framework for MQ capable IO schedulers
From
Date
On 12/22/2016 02:59 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>> Il giorno 17 dic 2016, alle ore 01:12, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> ha scritto:
>>
>> This adds a set of hooks that intercepts the blk-mq path of
>> allocating/inserting/issuing/completing requests, allowing
>> us to develop a scheduler within that framework.
>>
>> We reuse the existing elevator scheduler API on the registration
>> side, but augment that with the scheduler flagging support for
>> the blk-mq interfce, and with a separate set of ops hooks for MQ
>> devices.
>>
>> Schedulers can opt in to using shadow requests. Shadow requests
>> are internal requests that the scheduler uses for for the allocate
>> and insert part, which are then mapped to a real driver request
>> at dispatch time. This is needed to separate the device queue depth
>> from the pool of requests that the scheduler has to work with.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
>>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..b7e1839d4785
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
>
>> ...
>> +static inline bool
>> +blk_mq_sched_allow_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
>> + struct bio *bio)
>> +{
>> + struct elevator_queue *e = q->elevator;
>> +
>> + if (e && e->type->ops.mq.allow_merge)
>> + return e->type->ops.mq.allow_merge(q, rq, bio);
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>
> Something does not seem to add up here:
> e->type->ops.mq.allow_merge may be called only in
> blk_mq_sched_allow_merge, which, in its turn, may be called only in
> blk_mq_attempt_merge, which, finally, may be called only in
> blk_mq_merge_queue_io. Yet the latter may be called only if there is
> no elevator (line 1399 and 1507 in blk-mq.c).
>
> Therefore, e->type->ops.mq.allow_merge can never be called, both if
> there is and if there is not an elevator. Be patient if I'm missing
> something huge, but I thought it was worth reporting this.

I went through the current branch, and it seems mostly fine. There was
a double call to allow_merge() that I killed in the plug path, and one
set missing in blk_mq_sched_try_merge(). The rest looks OK.

--
Jens Axboe

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-17 03:49    [W:0.177 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site