Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Sat, 14 Jan 2017 04:41:15 -0800 | From | tip-bot for Matt Fleming <> | Subject | [tip:sched/core] sched/core: Reset RQCF_ACT_SKIP before unpinning rq->lock |
| |
Commit-ID: 92509b732baf14c59ca702307270cfaa3a585ae7 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/92509b732baf14c59ca702307270cfaa3a585ae7 Author: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> AuthorDate: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:38:11 +0100 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> CommitDate: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:29:31 +0100
sched/core: Reset RQCF_ACT_SKIP before unpinning rq->lock
rq_clock() is called from sched_info_{depart,arrive}() after resetting RQCF_ACT_SKIP but prior to a call to update_rq_clock().
In preparation for pending patches that check whether the rq clock has been updated inside of a pin context before rq_clock() is called, move the reset of rq->clock_skip_update immediately before unpinning the rq lock.
This will avoid the new warnings which check if update_rq_clock() is being actively skipped.
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> Cc: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160921133813.31976-6-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> --- kernel/sched/core.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 41df935..311460b 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -2887,6 +2887,9 @@ context_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, prev->active_mm = NULL; rq->prev_mm = oldmm; } + + rq->clock_skip_update = 0; + /* * Since the runqueue lock will be released by the next * task (which is an invalid locking op but in the case @@ -3392,7 +3395,6 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt) next = pick_next_task(rq, prev, &rf); clear_tsk_need_resched(prev); clear_preempt_need_resched(); - rq->clock_skip_update = 0; if (likely(prev != next)) { rq->nr_switches++; @@ -3402,6 +3404,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt) trace_sched_switch(preempt, prev, next); rq = context_switch(rq, prev, next, &rf); /* unlocks the rq */ } else { + rq->clock_skip_update = 0; rq_unpin_lock(rq, &rf); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock); }
| |