lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:25:57AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:

> Right, but we're going around in circles. I'm currently researching
> what it would take to be daemonless, so an ioctl which requires an
> access broker daemon would obviously be something I'd object to.

Well, when we figure out a security model that works for that and can
be implemented in the kernel then lets add the new cdev.

But that is *explicitly* not what Jarkko is doing, no reason to jump
the gun.

> Basically, though, I think you can do both: we can add an ioctl and the
> differing device hooks. I just think for that case RAW vs RM would be
> redundant.

Right, some future new cdev would only support ioctl and only the RM
path, but for priv use having both concurrently available makes sense
as a userspace broker producing a full RM will need to using both paths.

Jason

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-11 20:04    [W:0.085 / U:13.876 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site