lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] iio: pc104: Mask PC/104 drivers via the PC104 Kconfig option
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:45 PM, William Breathitt Gray
<vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:13:02PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>On 10/01/17 18:51, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
>>> PC/104 drivers should be hidden on machines which do not support PC/104
>>> devices. This patch adds the PC104 Kconfig option as a dependency for
>>> the relevant PC/104 device driver Kconfig options.
>>>
>>> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
>>> Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
>>> Cc: Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
>>> Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
>>Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
>>
>>Now the question is how to merge this one. Let me know if you
>>want me to take this one via IIO after the first patch is in.
>>If you want to take it another route I'm fine with that.
>>
>>Jonathan
>
> This is such a simple patchset that I envision Greg K-H picking up all
> three patches via driver-core; however, I'm pretty indifferent about the
> ultimate path in the end. I'll leave it up to Greg K-H to decide.

As long as Greg merges the first patch we can merge the two
others orthogonally I think.

It's just Kconfig symbols, not things that break compile.

(But I bet someone will come with automated warnings about
unused symbols in the kernel...)

Yours,
Linus Walleij

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-11 16:46    [W:0.084 / U:1.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site