Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:36:58 +0200 | From | Jarkko Sakkinen <> | Subject | Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager |
| |
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:29:08PM -0500, Ken Goldman wrote: > On 1/9/2017 6:16 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > Here's my cuts for the kernel: > > > > - Kernel virtualizes handle areas. It's mechanical. > > - Kernel does not virtualize bodies. It's not mechanical. > > - At least the first version of the RM will not do other than session > > isolation for sessions. > > Is it correct that "bodies" are the parameter area of the commands and > responses? > > if so, eventually something should virtualize getcapability. It may be > safer in user space, but it can mask RM issues.
body == command / response - (header + handle area)
/Jarkko
| |