lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCHv3 3/8] rtc: add STM32 RTC driver
From
Date
Hi Alexandre,

On 01/11/2017 01:08 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Looks good to me, however...
>
>
> On 05/01/2017 at 14:43:24 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote :
>> +struct stm32_rtc {
>> + struct rtc_device *rtc_dev;
>> + void __iomem *base;
>> + struct clk *ck_rtc;
>> + spinlock_t lock; /* Protects registers accesses */
>
> This spinlock seems to be useless, the rtc ops_lock is already
> protecting everywhere it is taken.
>
After having a deeper look on ops_lock, it seems this one is sufficient,
so I'll remove all spinlock uses in this driver.
>> + int irq_alarm;
>> +};
>> +
>
> [...]
>
>> +static int stm32_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
>> +{
>> + struct stm32_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + struct rtc_time *tm = &alrm->time;
>> + unsigned long irqflags;
>> + unsigned int cr, isr, alrmar;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + if (rtc_valid_tm(tm)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Alarm time not valid.\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> This will never happen, tm is already checked multiple times (up to
> three) in the core before this function can be called.
>
You're right. I'll remove all rtc_valid_tm calls.
>> + }
>> +
>
> You don't need to resend the whole series, just this patch. I'll take
> 2/8 and 3/8, the other ones can go through the stm32 tree.
>
Thanks for reviewing. I send a v4 for this patch right now.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-11 11:08    [W:0.120 / U:3.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site