Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 9 Sep 2016 13:17:49 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: Regulator probe |
| |
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 05:24:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 11:24 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Nothing says you have to describe all regulators, you just need to > > tell the core you have told it about everything you're going to tell > > it about. Until you do that the core has to assume that something may > > come along later and describe that supply.
> That's I would like to make work. For now we have fixed voltage > regulator which returns EPROBE_DEFER since GPIO IP is not initialized > yet at that point. But regulator framework decides that it's not > possible case and overrides the error code.
What do you mean? Of course we should handle probe deferral if we fail to get a resource like a GPIO. Are you trying to say that this doesn't work for you?
> For me it still looks that regulator framework would not intercept > deferred regulators in case of full constraints. Feels like I'm missing > something...
I can't parse the above, sorry. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |