lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 29/33] x86/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c: Tasks iterator and write
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> void rdtgroup_exit(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> + if (tsk->rdtgroup) {
> + atomic_dec(&tsk->rdtgroup->refcount);
> + tsk->rdtgroup = NULL;

The changelog still talks about this list stuff while this patch seems to
remove it and solely rely on the tsk->rdtgroup pointer, which is a sensible
thing to do.

Writing sensible changelogs would make the life of reviewers too easy,
right?

> + }
> +}
>
> - if (!list_empty(&tsk->rg_list)) {
> - struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp = tsk->rdtgroup;
> +static void show_rdt_tasks(struct rdtgroup *r, struct seq_file *s)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *p;
> + struct rdtgroup *this = r;
>
> - list_del_init(&tsk->rg_list);
> - tsk->rdtgroup = NULL;
> - atomic_dec(&rdtgrp->refcount);
> +
> + if (r == root_rdtgrp)
> + return;

Why has the root_rdtgroup a task file in the first place?

> static void rdtgroup_destroy_locked(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
> @@ -781,8 +811,6 @@ static int rdtgroup_mkdir(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn, const char *name,
> goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rdtgrp->pset.tasks);
> -
> cpumask_clear(&rdtgrp->cpu_mask);
>
> rdtgrp->root = root;
> @@ -843,7 +871,7 @@ static int rdtgroup_rmdir(struct kernfs_node *kn)
> if (!rdtgrp)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - if (!list_empty(&rdtgrp->pset.tasks)) {
> + if (atomic_read(&rdtgrp->refcount)) {

So you rely on rdtgrp->refcount completely now.

> /*
> * Forcibly remove all of subdirectories under root.
> @@ -1088,22 +1094,16 @@ void rdtgroup_fork(struct task_struct *child)
> {
> struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp;
>
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&child->rg_list);
> + child->rdtgroup = NULL;
> if (!rdtgroup_mounted)
> return;
>
> - mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
> -
> rdtgrp = current->rdtgroup;
> if (!rdtgrp)
> - goto out;
> + return;
>
> - list_add_tail(&child->rg_list, &rdtgrp->pset.tasks);
> child->rdtgroup = rdtgrp;
> atomic_inc(&rdtgrp->refcount);

This lacks any form of documentation WHY this is correct and works. I asked
you last time to document the locking and serialization rules ....

> cpumask_copy(&root->rdtgrp.cpu_mask, cpu_online_mask);

Can't remember if I told you already, but this is racy against hotplug.

> +static int _rdtgroup_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk, struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
> +{
> + if (tsk->rdtgroup)
> + atomic_dec(&tsk->rdtgroup->refcount);
> +
> + if (rdtgrp == root_rdtgrp)
> + tsk->rdtgroup = NULL;
> + else
> + tsk->rdtgroup = rdtgrp;
> +
> + atomic_inc(&rdtgrp->refcount);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rdtgroup_move_task(pid_t pid, struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp,
> + bool threadgroup, struct kernfs_open_file *of)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *tsk;
> + int ret;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + if (pid) {
> + tsk = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
> + if (!tsk) {
> + ret = -ESRCH;
> + goto out_unlock_rcu;
> + }
> + } else {
> + tsk = current;
> + }
> +
> + if (threadgroup)
> + tsk = tsk->group_leader;
> +
> + get_task_struct(tsk);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + ret = rdtgroup_procs_write_permission(tsk, of);
> + if (!ret)
> + _rdtgroup_move_task(tsk, rdtgrp);
> +
> + put_task_struct(tsk);
> + goto out_unlock_threadgroup;
> +
> +out_unlock_rcu:
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +out_unlock_threadgroup:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +ssize_t _rdtgroup_procs_write(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp,
> + struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
> + size_t nbytes, loff_t off, bool threadgroup)

global visible? And what is the underscore for?

> +{
> + pid_t pid;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (kstrtoint(strstrip(buf), 0, &pid) || pid < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;

Why do you evaluate the buffer inside the lock held region?

This function split is completely bogus and artificial.

> +
> + ret = rdtgroup_move_task(pid, rdtgrp, threadgroup, of);
> +
> + return ret ?: nbytes;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t rdtgroup_tasks_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
> + char *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t off)
> +{
> + struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp;
> + int ret;
> +
> + rdtgrp = rdtgroup_kn_lock_live(of->kn);
> + if (!rdtgrp)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + ret = _rdtgroup_procs_write(rdtgrp, of, buf, nbytes, off, false);
> +
> + rdtgroup_kn_unlock(of->kn);
> + return ret;
> +}

More sigh.

tglx

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-17 09:58    [W:0.389 / U:1.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site