Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil | Date | Thu, 08 Sep 2016 03:15:49 +0200 |
| |
On Wednesday, September 07, 2016 05:49:31 PM Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 02:44 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 07, 2016 05:35:50 PM Srinivas Pandruvada > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 17:22 -0700, Steve Muckle wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 02:56:48AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know what you think and if you can run some > > > > > benchmarks you > > > > > care about and see if the changes make any difference (this way > > > > > or > > > > > another), > > > > > please do that and let me know what you've found. > > > > > > > > LGTM (I just reviewed the first and last patch, skipping the > > > > intel_pstate ones). > > > > > > > > I was unable to see a conclusive power regression in Android > > > > audio, > > > > video or > > > > idle usecases on my hikey 96board. > > > Did you see any performance regression on Android workloads? > > > > That's with schedutil and IOwait boost. Why would performance > > regress? > Some Android tests reach thermal limits and aggressive throttling > causes performance issues.
I see, OK.
Thanks, Rafael
| |