lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil
Date
On Wednesday, September 07, 2016 05:49:31 PM Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 02:44 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 07, 2016 05:35:50 PM Srinivas Pandruvada
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 17:22 -0700, Steve Muckle wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 02:56:48AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Please let me know what you think and if you can run some
> > > > > benchmarks you
> > > > > care about and see if the changes make any difference (this way
> > > > > or
> > > > > another),
> > > > > please do that and let me know what you've found.
> > > >
> > > > LGTM (I just reviewed the first and last patch, skipping the
> > > > intel_pstate ones).
> > > >
> > > > I was unable to see a conclusive power regression in Android
> > > > audio,
> > > > video or
> > > > idle usecases on my hikey 96board.
> > > Did you see any performance regression on Android workloads?
> >
> > That's with schedutil and IOwait boost. Why would performance
> > regress?
> Some Android tests reach thermal limits and aggressive throttling
> causes performance issues.

I see, OK.

Thanks,
Rafael

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-17 09:58    [W:0.066 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site