[lkml]   [2016]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kcov: properly check if we are in an interrupt
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:21:32AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> I suspect there is a bunch of places that use in_interrupt(), but mean
> the same as KCOV wants -- am I in interrupt? and not am I in interrupt
> context or in normal task context but inside local_bh_disable(). For
> example, why does fput handles closure asynchronously if the task
> called local_bh_disable?

Agreed, but it would mean auditing all in_interrupt()/irq_count() users.

 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-27 09:35    [W:0.067 / U:1.260 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site