lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: aspeed: added documentation for Aspeed I2C driver
Hi Brendan,

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Brendan Higgins
<brendanhiggins@google.com> wrote:
> First off, someone pointed out to me that the mapping that I used between
> addresses and bus numbers is not actually valid for busses 8-14.
>
> This could be fixed by checking the offset, but I am wondering if that is
> the right way to do it. It seems like this is not completely trivial so
> maybe this should be specified in the device tree? If that is the case,
> should I do this as another reg entry or go back to the way I was doing it
> before?

I don't see an alternative way to derive these numbers. As you
mention, the block of SRAM in the middle of the IP screwing up the
linear mapping.

I suggest going back to what you have in v2, with a mention in the
commit message as to why the bus property is necessary.

Cheers,

Joel

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-23 08:03    [W:0.108 / U:0.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site