lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V6 3/5] PCI: thunder-pem: Allow to probe PEM-specific register range for ACPI case
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 02:10:55PM +0000, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Hi Bjorn
>
> [...]
>
>
> >
> > If future hardware is completely ECAM-compliant and we don't need any
> > more MCFG quirks, that would be great.
> >
> > But we'll still need to describe that memory-mapped config space
> > somewhere. If that's done with PNP0C02 or similar devices (as is done
> > on my x86 laptop), we'd be all set.
> >
> > If we need to work around firmware in the field that doesn't do that,
> > one possibility is a PNP quirk along the lines of
> > quirk_amd_mmconfig_area().
>
> So, if my understanding is correct, for platforms that have not been
> shipped yet you propose to use PNP0C02 in the ACPI table in order to
> declare a motherboard reserved resource whereas for shipped platforms
> you propose to have a quirk along pnp_fixups in order to track the
> resource usage even if values are hardcoded...correct?

Yes. I'm open to alternate proposals, but x86 uses PNP0C02, and
following existing practice seems reasonable.

> Before Tomasz came up with this patchset we had a call between the vendors
> involved in this PCI quirks saga and other guys from Linaro and ARM.
>
> Lorenzo summarized the outcome as in the following link
> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1606.2/03344.html
>
> Since this quirks mechanism has been discussed for quite a long time now
> IMHO it would be good to have a last call including also you (Bjorn) so
> that we can all agree on what to do and we avoid changing our drivers again
> and again...

I think we're converging pretty fast. As far as I'm concerned, the
v6 ECAM quirks implementation is perfect. The only remaining issue is
reporting the ECAM resources, and I haven't seen objections to using
PNP0C02 + PNP quirks for broken firmware.

There is the question of how or whether to associate a PNP0A03 PCI
bridge with resources from a different PNP0C02 device, but that's not
super important. If the hard-coded resources appear both in a quirk
and in the PCI bridge driver, it's ugly but not the end of the world.
We've still achieved the objective of avoiding landmines in the
address space.

Bjorn

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-23 00:00    [W:0.320 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site