Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Sep 2016 10:10:09 +0200 | From | Cornelia Huck <> | Subject | Re: virtio_blk: Less function calls in init_vq() after error detection |
| |
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:24:58 +0200 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> See, some of your patches are accepted, e.g. the memdup_user changes have usually > been applied by most maintainers including myself. If maintainers won't take other change, > please accept that. If you continue to waste peoples time by discussing "maybe" patches > you actually risk that people will stop taking any patches from you including the "yes" > ones.
FWIW, he already gained a place on my ignore list for pestering me offline about his patches and not stopping even when told to do so. So while I won't object if you choose to apply selected patches, I won't comment on any and won't take any (hey, I even won't see them unless someone else replies...)
| |