lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2] perf tools: adding support for address filters
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:30:16AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On 31 August 2016 at 00:57, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:10:15AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> >> This patch makes it possible to use the current filter
> >> framework with address filters. That way address filters for
> >> HW tracers such as CoreSight and IntelPT can be communicated
> >> to the kernel drivers.
> >>
> >> CC: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Changes for V2:
> >> - Rebased to v4.8-rc4.
> >> - Revisited error path.
> >> ---
> >>
> >> tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> >> index 2eb8b1ed4cc8..1df413fbf7f8 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> >> @@ -1760,12 +1760,26 @@ foreach_evsel_in_last_glob(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
> >> static int set_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, const void *arg)
> >> {
> >> const char *str = arg;
> >> + bool found = false;
> >> + int nr_addr_filters = 0;
> >> + struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
> >>
> >> - if (evsel == NULL || evsel->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT) {
> >> - fprintf(stderr,
> >> - "--filter option should follow a -e tracepoint option\n");
> >> - return -1;
> >> - }
> >> + if (evsel == NULL)
> >> + goto err;
> >> +
> >> + while ((pmu = perf_pmu__scan(pmu)) != NULL)
> >> + if (pmu->type == evsel->attr.type) {
> >> + found = true;
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (found)
> >> + perf_pmu__scan_file(pmu, "nr_addr_filters",
> >> + "%d", &nr_addr_filters);
> >> +
> >> +
> >> + if (evsel->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT && !nr_addr_filters)
> >> + goto err;
> >
> > should we display another error message for !nr_addr_filters case?
> > the one below is misleading in this case
>
> The condition where nr_addr_filters == 0 is valid when we are dealing
> with a tracepoint event. Since we don't have an attribute type for HW
> tracers the best we can do is improve on the error message. What
> would you think of:
>
> "--filter option should follow an event that supports filtering"

ok, in this case I think the original one is better

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

thanks,
jirka

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-17 09:58    [W:0.040 / U:1.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site