Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Bisected: Kernel deadlock bug related to cgroups. | From | Balbir Singh <> | Date | Wed, 31 Aug 2016 20:33:53 +1000 |
| |
On 31/08/16 20:16, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 08/30, Brent Lovelace wrote: >> >> I found a kernel deadlock regression bug introduced in the 4.4 kernel. > ... >> I bisected to this commit id: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> commit c9e75f0492b248aeaa7af8991a6fc9a21506bc96 >> Author: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> >> Date: Fri Nov 27 19:57:19 2015 +0100 >> >> cgroup: pids: fix race between cgroup_post_fork() and cgroup_migrate() > > Thanks Brent! > >> systemd D ffff88007dfcfd10 0 1 0 0x00000000 >> ffff88007dfcfd10 00ff88007dfcfcd8 0000000000000001 ffff88007e296f80 >> ffff88007dff8000 ffff88007dfd0000 ffffffff82bae220 ffff880036758c00 >> fffffffffffffff2 ffff88005e327b00 ffff88007dfcfd28 ffffffff816c571f >> Call Trace: >> [<ffffffff816c571f>] schedule+0x7a/0x8f >> [<ffffffff81126ed2>] percpu_down_write+0xad/0xc4 >> [<ffffffff811220c8>] ? wake_up_atomic_t+0x25/0x25 >> [<ffffffff81169b4d>] __cgroup_procs_write+0x72/0x229 >> [<ffffffff8112b2eb>] ? lock_acquire+0x103/0x18f > > so it sleeps in wait_event() waiting for active readers, and the new > readers will block. In particular, do_exit() will block. >
New readers/writers both, usually this is a sign that a reader is already holding the percpu rwsem.
>> kworker/u8:2 D ffff880036befb58 0 185 2 0x00000000 >> Workqueue: netns cleanup_net >> ffff880036befb58 00ff880036befbd0 ffffffff00000002 ffff88007e316f80 >> ffff8800783e8000 ffff880036bf0000 ffff88005917bed0 ffff8800783e8000 >> ffffffff816c8953 ffff88005917bed8 ffff880036befb70 ffffffff816c571f >> Call Trace: >> [<ffffffff816c8953>] ? usleep_range+0x3a/0x3a >> [<ffffffff816c571f>] schedule+0x7a/0x8f >> [<ffffffff816c8982>] schedule_timeout+0x2f/0xd8 >> [<ffffffff816c9204>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x3f >> [<ffffffff816c8953>] ? usleep_range+0x3a/0x3a >> [<ffffffff81129ea2>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16f/0x18b >> [<ffffffff816c5f44>] do_wait_for_common+0xf0/0x127 >> [<ffffffff816c5f44>] ? do_wait_for_common+0xf0/0x127 >> [<ffffffff811101c3>] ? wake_up_q+0x42/0x42 >> [<ffffffff816c5ff2>] wait_for_common+0x36/0x50 >> [<ffffffff816c6024>] wait_for_completion+0x18/0x1a >> [<ffffffff81106b5f>] kthread_stop+0xc8/0x217 >> [<ffffffffa06d440c>] pg_net_exit+0xbc/0x112 [pktgen] >> [<ffffffff81604fa2>] ops_exit_list+0x3d/0x4e >> [<ffffffff81606123>] cleanup_net+0x19f/0x234 >> [<ffffffff81101aa3>] process_one_work+0x237/0x46b >> [<ffffffff8110216d>] worker_thread+0x1e7/0x292 >> [<ffffffff81101f86>] ? rescuer_thread+0x285/0x285 >> [<ffffffff81106ded>] kthread+0xc4/0xcc >> [<ffffffff81106d29>] ? kthread_parkme+0x1f/0x1f >> [<ffffffff816c9d6f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70 >> [<ffffffff81106d29>] ? kthread_parkme+0x1f/0x1f >> 3 locks held by kworker/u8:2/185: >> #0: ("%s""netns"){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff811019ad>] >> process_one_work+0x141/0x46b >> #1: (net_cleanup_work){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811019ad>] >> process_one_work+0x141/0x46b >> #2: (net_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81605ffe>] cleanup_net+0x7a/0x234 > > Note that it sleeps with net_mutex held. Probably waiting for kpktgend_* > below. > >> vsftpd D ffff880054867c68 0 4352 2611 0x00000000 >> ffff880054867c68 00ff88005933a480 ffff880000000000 ffff88007e216f80 >> ffff88005933a480 ffff880054868000 0000000000000246 ffff880054867cc0 >> ffff88005933a480 ffffffff81cea268 ffff880054867c80 ffffffff816c571f >> Call Trace: >> [<ffffffff816c571f>] schedule+0x7a/0x8f >> [<ffffffff816c59b1>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x10/0x19 >> [<ffffffff816c64c0>] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c0/0x3a0 >> [<ffffffff81606233>] ? copy_net_ns+0x7b/0xf8 >> [<ffffffff81606233>] copy_net_ns+0x7b/0xf8 >> [<ffffffff81606233>] ? copy_net_ns+0x7b/0xf8 >> [<ffffffff811073c9>] create_new_namespaces+0xfc/0x16b >> [<ffffffff8110759c>] copy_namespaces+0x164/0x186 >> [<ffffffff810ea6b1>] copy_process+0x10d2/0x195d >> [<ffffffff810eb094>] _do_fork+0x8c/0x2fb >> [<ffffffff81003044>] ? lockdep_sys_exit_thunk+0x12/0x14 >> [<ffffffff810eb375>] SyS_clone+0x14/0x16 >> [<ffffffff816c99b6>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x76 >> 2 locks held by vsftpd/4352: >> #0: (&cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff810e9b97>] >> copy_process+0x5b8/0x195d >> #1: (net_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81606233>] copy_net_ns+0x7b/0xf8 > > This waits for net_mutex held by kworker/u8:2 above. And with > cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem acquired for reading, that is why systemd > above hangs. > >> kpktgend_0 D ffff88005917bce8 0 4354 2 0x00000000 >> ffff88005917bce8 00ffffffa06d5d06 ffff880000000000 ffff88007e216f80 >> ffff88007a4ec900 ffff88005917c000 ffff88007a4ec900 ffffffffa06d5d06 >> ffff88005917bed0 0000000000000000 ffff88005917bd00 ffffffff816c571f >> Call Trace: >> [<ffffffffa06d5d06>] ? pg_net_init+0x346/0x346 [pktgen] >> [<ffffffff816c571f>] schedule+0x7a/0x8f >> [<ffffffff816c85ee>] rwsem_down_read_failed+0xdc/0xf8 >> [<ffffffff8136d634>] call_rwsem_down_read_failed+0x14/0x30 >> [<ffffffff8136d634>] ? call_rwsem_down_read_failed+0x14/0x30 >> [<ffffffff810f91e0>] ? exit_signals+0x17/0x103 >> [<ffffffff81126dc4>] ? percpu_down_read+0x4d/0x5f >> [<ffffffff810f91e0>] exit_signals+0x17/0x103 >> [<ffffffff810ed342>] do_exit+0x105/0x9a4 >> [<ffffffffa06d5d06>] ? pg_net_init+0x346/0x346 [pktgen] >> [<ffffffff81106df5>] kthread+0xcc/0xcc >> [<ffffffff81106d29>] ? kthread_parkme+0x1f/0x1f >> [<ffffffff816c9d6f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70 >> [<ffffffff81106d29>] ? kthread_parkme+0x1f/0x1f >> 1 lock held by kpktgend_0/4354: >> #0: (&cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff810f91e0>] > > it can't take cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem for reading, so it can't exit, > and that is why kworker/u8:2 hangs. > >> kpktgend_1 D ffff88007a4e3ce8 0 4355 2 0x00000000 > ... >> kpktgend_2 D ffff8800549f7ce8 0 4356 2 0x00000000 > ... >> kpktgend_3 D ffff88005e2b7ce8 0 4357 2 0x00000000 > ... > > The same. > > Could you try the recent 568ac888215c7fb2fab "cgroup: reduce read > locked section of cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem during fork" patch? > Attached below. > > > With this patch copy_net_ns() should be called outside of > cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem, the deadlock should hopefully go away. > > Thanks,
Yes, I would be interested in seeing if this race goes away. Thanks for the pointer Oleg!
Balbir Singh.
| |