lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] time: alarmtimer: Add the trcepoints for alarmtimer
Hi Steven,

On 30 August 2016 at 23:42, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 19:50:20 +0800
> Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 22 August 2016 at 12:23, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> wrote:
>> > For system debugging, we usually want to know who sets one alarm timer, the
>> > time of the timer, when the timer started and fired and so on. Thus adding
>> > tracepoints can help us trace the alarmtimer information.
>> >
>> > For example, when we debug the system supend/resume, if the system is always
>> > resumed by RTC alarm, we can find out which process set the alarm timer to
>> > resume system by below trace log:
>> >
>> > ......
>> > Binder:2976_6-3473 [005] d..2 1076.587732: alarmtimer_start: process:Binder:2976_6
>> > alarmtimer type:ALARM_BOOTTIME expires:1234154000000 time: 1970-1-1 0:20:35
>> >
>> > Binder:2976_7-3480 [002] d..2 1076.592707: alarmtimer_cancel: process:Binder:2976_7
>> > alarmtimer type:ALARM_BOOTTIME expires:1325463060000000000 time: 2012-1-2 0:11:0
>> >
>> > Binder:2976_7-3480 [002] d..2 1076.592731: alarmtimer_start: process:Binder:2976_7
>> > alarmtimer type:ALARM_BOOTTIME expires:1325378040000000000 time: 2012-1-1 0:34:0
>> >
>> > system_server-2976 [003] d..2 1076.605587: alarmtimer_cancel: process:system_server
>> > alarmtimer type:ALARM_BOOTTIME expires:1234154000000 time: 1970-1-1 0:20:35
>> >
>> > system_server-2976 [003] d..2 1076.605608: alarmtimer_start: process:system_server
>> > alarmtimer type:ALARM_BOOTTIME expires:1234155000000 time: 1970-1-1 0:20:35
>> >
>> > system_server-3000 [002] ...1 1087.737565: alarmtimer_suspend: alarmtimer type:ALARM_BOOTTIME
>> > expires time: 2012-1-1 0:34:0
>> > ......
>> >
>> > From the trace log, we can find out the 'Binder:2976_7' process set one alarm
>> > timer which resumes the system.
>>
>> Do you have any comments about this patch? Thanks.
>
> Looks fine to me.
>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> Now you need to get the time maintainers to accept it.

Thanks.

--
Baolin.wang
Best Regards

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-17 09:58    [W:0.110 / U:0.596 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site