lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 14/14] Documentation: remove the constraint on the distances of node pairs
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 06:44:39PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>
>
> On 2016/8/26 23:35, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:44:53PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> >> Update documentation. This limit is unneccessary.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> >> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt | 1 -
> >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt
> >> index 21b3505..c0ea4a7 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt
> >> @@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ distance (memory latency) between all numa nodes.
> >>
> >> Note:
> >> 1. Each entry represents distance from first node to second node.
> >> - The distances are equal in either direction.
> >
> > Hmm, so what happens now if firmware provides a description where both
> > distances (in either direction) are supplied, but are different?
> I have not known any hardware that the distances of two direction are
> different yet

Then let's not add support for this just yet. When we have systems that
actually need it, we'll be in a much better position to assess the
suitability of any patches. At the moment, the whole thing is pretty
questionable and it adds needless complication to the code.

Will

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-17 09:58    [W:0.884 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site