lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Kernel NFS boot failure
From
Date
Hi Vladimir,

On 08/03/2016 03:06 PM, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> On 03/08/16 12:41, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> We observe Kernel boot failure while running NFS boot stress test (1000 iterations):
>> - Linux version 4.7.0

I'd like to pay your attention that this issue also reproducible with
Kernel 4.7.0!
The same can be seen from the log I've provided in first e-mail:
[ 0.000000] Linux version 4.7.0 (lcpdbld@dflsdit-build06.dal.design.ti.com) (gcc version 4.9.3 20150413 (prerelease) (Linaro GCC 4.9-2015.05) ) #1 SMP Fri Jul 29 17:41:27 CDT 2016


I've not run the test with current master at it's not been tagged yet.

>> - am335x-evm (TI AM335x EVM)
>> - failure rate 10-20 times per test.
>> Originally this issue was reproduced using TI Kernel 4.4
>> ( git://git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel.git, branch: ti-linux-4.4.y)
>> on both am335x-evm and am57xx-beagle-x15(am57xx-evm) platforms.
>> This issues has not been reproduced with TI Kernel 4.1 before.
>>
>> The SysRq shows that system stuck in nfs_fs_mount()
>>
>> [ 207.904632] [<c07ab34c>] (schedule) from [<c0783554>] (rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x2c/0xd8)
>> [ 207.912996] [<c0783554>] (rpc_wait_bit_killable) from [<c07ab7f0>] (__wait_on_bit+0x84/0xc0)
>> [ 207.921812] [<c07ab7f0>] (__wait_on_bit) from [<c07ab890>] (out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x64/0x70)
>> [ 207.930810] [<c07ab890>] (out_of_line_wait_on_bit) from [<c07843f4>] (__rpc_execute+0x18c/0x544)
>> [ 207.939988] [<c07843f4>] (__rpc_execute) from [<c0779f24>] (rpc_run_task+0x13c/0x158)
>> [ 207.948166] [<c0779f24>] (rpc_run_task) from [<c0779f84>] (rpc_call_sync+0x44/0xc4)
>> [ 207.956163] [<c0779f84>] (rpc_call_sync) from [<c077a04c>] (rpc_ping+0x48/0x68)
>> [ 207.963796] [<c077a04c>] (rpc_ping) from [<c077a158>] (rpc_create_xprt+0xec/0x164)
>> [ 207.971702] [<c077a158>] (rpc_create_xprt) from [<c077a2c0>] (rpc_create+0xf0/0x1a0)
>> [ 207.979794] [<c077a2c0>] (rpc_create) from [<c0393088>] (nfs_create_rpc_client+0xd4/0xec)
>> [ 207.988338] [<c0393088>] (nfs_create_rpc_client) from [<c0394d10>] (nfs_init_client+0x20/0x78)
>> [ 207.997332] [<c0394d10>] (nfs_init_client) from [<c03949d4>] (nfs_create_server+0xa0/0x3bc)
>> [ 208.006057] [<c03949d4>] (nfs_create_server) from [<c03b197c>] (nfs3_create_server+0x8/0x20)
>> [ 208.014879] [<c03b197c>] (nfs3_create_server) from [<c03a34c4>] (nfs_try_mount+0xc4/0x1f0)
>> [ 208.023513] [<c03a34c4>] (nfs_try_mount) from [<c03a2c48>] (nfs_fs_mount+0x290/0x910)
>> [ 208.031702] [<c03a2c48>] (nfs_fs_mount) from [<c0294d24>] (mount_fs+0x44/0x168)
>>
>> Has anyone else seen this issue?
>>
>> I'd be appreciated for any help or advice related to this issue?
>
> I did not look at details, but because it is 4.4 and __wait_on_bit
> showed up you might want to look at [1]
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/20/472

Thanks. I'll take a look.

--
regards,
-grygorii

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-08-03 17:41    [W:0.035 / U:1.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site