Messages in this thread | | | Subject | checkkpatch (in)sanity ? | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Sat, 27 Aug 2016 13:40:52 -0700 |
| |
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 01:26:35PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:46:51AM -0400, Levin, Alexander wrote: >> - Making checkpatch check for (some) of the stable kernel rules >> (and possibly recommend adding the stable@ tag in certain cases?). >> - Depends on: making checkpatch sane again.>This sounds interesting. What do you mean by "sane"?
Sasha, can you expand your thoughts here please?
Most all of the trivial spacing stuff can easily be ignored either by a human determining what's important or by using command line options like --ignore=spacing
| |