lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v05 60/72] arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/signal.h: use __kernel_size_t instead of size_t
Date
On Monday, August 22, 2016 8:33:17 PM CEST Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/signal.h b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/signal.h
> index 33073bd..859f2de 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/signal.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/signal.h
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ struct sigaction {
> typedef struct sigaltstack {
> void __user *ss_sp;
> int ss_flags;
> - size_t ss_size;
> + __kernel_size_t ss_size;
> } stack_t;

I was going to reply with an Ack, but on further consideration,
I'm not sure if we can't do this in general: size_t may be either
'unsigned int' or 'unsigned long' (depending on the architecture
and toolchain), and if kernel and glibc disagree on this, we
have a problem with any user space code that expects sigaltstack->ss_size
to be the same type as size_t (as mandated by the man page).

I wonder if there is another way to address this.

Arnd

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-17 09:57    [W:1.960 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site