lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 0891/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Date
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
drivers/s390/net/ctcm_sysfs.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_sysfs.c b/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_sysfs.c
index ddb0aa3..103bdde 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_sysfs.c
@@ -186,10 +186,10 @@ static ssize_t ctcm_type_show(struct device *dev,
ctcm_type[cgdev->cdev[0]->id.driver_info]);
}

-static DEVICE_ATTR(buffer, 0644, ctcm_buffer_show, ctcm_buffer_write);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(protocol, 0644, ctcm_proto_show, ctcm_proto_store);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(type, 0444, ctcm_type_show, NULL);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(stats, 0644, stats_show, stats_write);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(buffer, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, ctcm_buffer_show, ctcm_buffer_write);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(protocol, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, ctcm_proto_show, ctcm_proto_store);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(type, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, ctcm_type_show, NULL);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(stats, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, stats_show, stats_write);

static struct attribute *ctcm_attr[] = {
&dev_attr_protocol.attr,
--
2.9.2
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-08-02 15:21    [W:0.035 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site