Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:14:22 +0200 (CEST) | From | Thomas Voegtle <> | Subject | Re: Linux 4.1.28 |
| |
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:04:48PM +0200, Thomas Voegtle wrote: >> And that one? >> Happens while trying to start a firewall script with iptables-restore. >> >> [ 180.071999] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! >> [iptables-restor:2338] > ... >> [ 180.072000] Call Trace: >> [ 180.072000] [<ffffffff8111a923>] ? __kmalloc_node+0x26/0x2d >> [ 180.072000] [<ffffffff81667495>] ? cpumask_next+0x1b/0x1d >> [ 180.072000] [<ffffffff81668ec3>] ? xt_alloc_table_info+0xc2/0xdf >> [ 180.072000] [<ffffffffc05be6c3>] do_ipt_set_ctl+0xfd/0x193 [ip_tables] >> [ 180.072000] [<ffffffff81665181>] nf_sockopt+0x64/0x7e >> [ 180.072000] [<ffffffff816651cc>] nf_setsockopt+0x1c/0x20 >> [ 180.072000] [<ffffffff81674dd1>] ip_setsockopt+0x6e/0x8e >> [ 180.072000] [<ffffffff8168fe47>] raw_setsockopt+0x11/0x4c >> [ 180.072000] [<ffffffff816296ab>] sock_common_setsockopt+0xf/0x11 >> [ 180.072000] [<ffffffff81628ab2>] SyS_setsockopt+0x85/0xa5 >> [ 180.072000] [<ffffffff816e7dee>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x71 > > This should be the problem addressed by > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/422215 > > Michal Kubecek
Hi,
I re-checked your patch today on top of a 4.1.29 and I'm very sorry to say it actually does fix the problem despite what I wrote a few days ago.
I don't know why I saw the problem while I was sure I had that patch applied. Maybe I mixed up the builds. Should have double checked it.
So, if that patch would appear in the next 4.1.y, that would be great.
talking about that patch: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/650120/ (as gmame is down atm)
thanks,
Thomas
| |