Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Xunlei Pang <> | Subject | [PATCH v2 2/2] kexec: Consider crashk_low_res in sanity_check_segment_list() | Date | Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:50:57 +0800 |
| |
We have crashk_res only in most cases, but sometimes we have crashk_low_res.
For example, on 64-bit x86 systems, when "crashkernel=32M,high" combined with "crashkernel=128M,low" is used, so some segments may have the chance to be loaded into crashk_low_res area. We can't fail it as a memory violation in these cases.
Thus, we add the case to regard the segment as valid if it is within crashk_low_res.
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com> --- kernel/kexec_core.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kexec_core.c b/kernel/kexec_core.c index 707d18e..9012a60 100644 --- a/kernel/kexec_core.c +++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c @@ -248,9 +248,14 @@ int sanity_check_segment_list(struct kimage *image) mstart = image->segment[i].mem; mend = mstart + image->segment[i].memsz - 1; /* Ensure we are within the crash kernel limits */ - if ((mstart < phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_res.start)) || - (mend > phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_res.end))) - return -EADDRNOTAVAIL; + if ((mstart >= phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_res.start)) && + (mend <= phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_res.end))) + continue; + if ((mstart >= phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_low_res.start)) && + (mend <= phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_low_res.end))) + continue; + + return -EADDRNOTAVAIL; } } -- 1.8.3.1
| |