lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v12] acpi, apei, arm64: APEI initial support for aarch64.
Hi Borislav.

On 4 August 2016 at 18:30, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> wrote:
> Tomasz's linaro address bounces, adding one I've found on lkml to CC
> instead.

Thanks for reminding me, I have added him(tn@semihalf.com) in TO list.
The dated email address(tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org) was added by "git
send-email".
I have disabled it by "--no-signed-off-by-cc"

>
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 11:48:38AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 04:57:44PM +0800, fu.wei@linaro.org wrote:
>> > From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
>> >
>> > This commit provides APEI arch-specific bits for aarch64
>> >
>> > Meanwhile,
>> > (1)add a new subfunction "hest_ia32_init" for
>> > "acpi_disable_cmcff" which is used by IA-32 Architecture
>> > Corrected Machine Check (CMC).
>> > (2)move HEST type (ACPI_HEST_TYPE_IA32_CORRECTED_CHECK) checking to
>> > a generic place.
>> > (3)select HAVE_ACPI_APEI when EFI and ACPI is set on ARM64,
>> > because arch_apei_get_mem_attribute is using efi_mem_attributes on ARM64.
>> >
>> > [Fu Wei: improve && upstream]
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
>> > Tested-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org>
>> > Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>> > Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
>> > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>> > ---
>>
>> ...
>>
>> > @@ -110,8 +111,21 @@ static inline const char *acpi_get_enable_method(int cpu)
>> > }
>> >
>> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI
>> > +#define acpi_disable_cmcff 1
>>
>> What does that mean? ARM doesn't have firmware-first mode?
>>
>> A piece of comment please.
>>
>> > pgprot_t arch_apei_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr);
>> > -#endif
>> > +
>> > +/*
>> > + * Despite its name, this function must still broadcast the TLB
>> > + * invalidation in order to ensure other CPUs don't up with junk
>> ^
>> end
>>
>> > + * entries as a result of speculation. Unusually, its also called in
>> > + * IRQ context (ghes_iounmap_irq) so if we ever need to use IPIs for
>> > + * TLB broadcasting, then we're in trouble here.
>> > + */
>> > +static inline void arch_apei_flush_tlb_one(unsigned long addr)
>> > +{
>> > + flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE);
>> > +}
>> > +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_APEI */
>> >
>> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
>> > int arm64_acpi_numa_init(void);
>> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c
>> > index c280df6..ea3046e 100644
>> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c
>> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c
>>
>> ...
>>
>> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
>> > index 20b3fcf..792a0d9 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
>> > @@ -232,8 +243,9 @@ void __init acpi_hest_init(void)
>> > goto err;
>> > }
>> >
>> > - if (!acpi_disable_cmcff)
>> > - apei_hest_parse(hest_parse_cmc, NULL);
>> > + rc = hest_ia32_init();
>>
>> Why do you need a separate hest_ia32_init() here?
>>
>> You can do
>>
>> rc = apei_hest_parse(hest_parse_cmc, NULL);
>>
>> directly here AFAICT.
>>
>> > + if (rc)
>> > + goto err;
>> >
>> > if (!ghes_disable) {
>> > rc = apei_hest_parse(hest_parse_ghes_count, &ghes_count);
>> > --
>> > 2.5.5
>> >
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
>
> SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> --



--
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-08-10 22:21    [W:0.070 / U:2.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site