lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] ARM: at91: Document new TCB bindings
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 12:36:31 +0200
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> wrote:

> On 04/07/2016 at 12:24:52 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote :
> > On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 23:52:05 +0200
> > Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > > +One interrupt per TC block:
> > > + tcb0: timer@fff7c000 {
> > > + compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-tcb", "simple-mfd", "syscon";
> > > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > > + reg = <0xfff7c000 0x100>;
> > > + interrupts = <18 4>;
> > > + clocks = <&tcb0_clk>, <&clk32k>;
> > > + clock-names = "t0_clk", "slow_clk";
> > > +
> > > + timer@0 {
> > > + compatible = "atmel,tcb-timer";
> > > + reg = <0>, <1>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + timer@2 {
> > > + compatible = "atmel,tcb-timer";
> > > + reg = <2>;
> > > + };
> >
> > And how can you differentiate the clocksource from the clkevent?
> >
>
> It doesn't really matter actually, I'll do the selection in the driver,
> as suggested by Rob.
>

Yes, I've read Rob's review, but then what's the point of defining 2
timer nodes, just do the detection based on the number of channels
you've reserved for the timer and define a single node.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-04 14:21    [W:0.051 / U:1.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site