lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v8 2/7] Input: cros_ec_keyb - Stop handling interrupts directly
On 1 July 2016 at 10:49, Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Tomeu,
>
> 2016-04-26 9:06 GMT+02:00 Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>:
>> On 26 April 2016 at 08:57, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25 April 2016 at 23:17, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:32:25PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>>> >> From: Vic Yang <victoryang@google.com>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Because events other that keyboard ones will be handled by now on by
>>>> >> other drivers, stop directly handling interrupts and instead listen to
>>>> >> the new notifier in the MFD driver.
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > Hmm, where did Vic's sign-off go?
>>>>
>>>> Lee Jones asked to remove them in a previous version as he considers
>>>> them superfluous. My understanding is that as I'm the first to submit
>>>> them to mainline, the chain starts with me (I certify the b section of
>>>> http://developercertificate.org/).
>>>
>>> Hmm... It seems what I said has been misconstrued a little. You
>>> *should* remove SoBs from people who were *only* part of the
>>> submission path. However, you should *not* remove SoBs from patch
>>> *authors*. Since Vic is the author (or at least one of them), their
>>> SoB should remain.
>>>
>>> Apologies if that was not clear.
>>
>> I see now, will fix the tags in the next revision.
>>
>
> With your permission I'll fix this and send a new patch series with
> only the patch that adds the MKBP event support and this patch. These
> two patches has sense by itself and are only a dependency of cros-ec
> USB PD driver and other drivers, so I think makes sense send within a
> separate series to increase the possibility to get merged and don't
> block other drivers that depends on these.

Sounds great, MKBP event support is indeed a dependency for the
upcoming features that we want to upstream.

Thanks,

Tomeu

> Thanks,
>
> Enric
>
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tomeu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-04 14:01    [W:0.045 / U:0.576 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site